Shadow minister for agriculture James Paice supports food security task force and research funding shift

Shadow minister for agriculture James Paice MP has welcomed the introduction of the food security task force by the Environment Secretary Hilary Benn -- and the shift of funding for R&D to the Technology Strategy Board (TSB).

However, he stopped short of making any commitment to fund a push on consumption of UK fruit and vegetables unless savings could be made elsewhere.

Paice said: "Clearly we welcome Benn's very belated conversion to the recognition that British food production is important." He added that the task force "may well come up with some very useful stuff".

But he stressed: "We are not talking about extra spending on anything unless someone can identify what we are going to cut to pay for the new thing."

Paice said the TSB was a good idea "in principal" but maintained that its financing had "to be sorted out much more clearly".

Still on the subject of R&D, he echoed previous Conservative Party concerns over Wellesbourne and acknowledged the problems created by the abolition of HortLINK - as well as the crisis over match funding for levy monies.

He said: "At the moment we are trying to map out where all the (R&D) money comes from and where it is being spent. We have got this unbelievable mess that Defra has made by abolishing all the link programmes and shifting them into the TSB, only to find that levy board money is considered state aid and it hasn't got EU approval (to use it for match funding)."

He confirmed that the party was investigating Defra quangos including the Forestry Commission, Natural England and the Environment Agency as part of its drive for savings, while the agricultural wages board would be abolished if the Tories got into power.

On climate change, Paice said he was in favour of increasing canopy cover but the party would not be setting any targets. "Adaptation across the whole climate change agenda has to be very, very important. What I can't say here is precisely how that would happen in an age of austerity."

Finally, he rejected the idea of a horticulture minister while pledging to cut back on regulation. "I think that at the end of the day it has to be recognised that it (horticulture) is part and parcel of land use. The last thing we need to be doing is becoming more interventionist with horticulture."


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

What does the 25-year plan mean for growers?

What does the 25-year plan mean for growers?

Published on 11 January, the Government's long-awaited 'A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment' brings together a number of policy strands into a single framework that will impact many sectors, not least fresh produce, over the coming decades.

What will 'embracing change' mean for horticulture?

What will 'embracing change' mean for horticulture?

At the Oxford Farming Conference, whose theme was "embracing change", Defra secretary Michael Gove expanded on what a post-Brexit UK agriculture and land-use policy will look like and how it will impact farmers and growers.

Can growers see off the looming labour crisis by boosting efficiency?

Can growers see off the looming labour crisis by boosting efficiency?

Concern over the availability of seasonal labour to the fresh-produce industry has never been greater.