Suggestions of a crisis in horticultural training nearly overthrew TV gardener Alan Titchmarsh’s motion that gardening is core to the British way of life, at an RHS-hosted debate last week.
More than 250 delegates attended the event called Private Passion or National Indifference — Is Gardening Still Core to the British Way of Life?, held at the National Geographic Society in London.
The audience heard Titchmarsh — who was supported by HW commentator Peter Seabrook — defend the motion by 10 per cent against University of Sheffield professor of landscape architecture James Hitchmough and garden designer and lecturer Andrew Wilson.
While Titchmarsh and Seabrook spoke of a passionate nation keeping gardening at the core of Britishness, opponents felt that this was an unrealistic statement, highlighting the younger generation’s indifference to working within the horticulture industry.
Wilson said: “A good horticultural education is virtually non-existent compared to the courses being offered in garden design.
“Because of the amount of TV gardening programmes we are seeing a preference for profession over skill — the attraction of creativity over knowledge.”
Both Titchmarsh and Seabrook recognised the trend argued by their opponents but fought back with claims that gardening is a deep-rooted passion of Britons and is core to the British way of life.
Have you registered with us yet?
Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins
Sign up now