NFU hits out at EU's "poor science" underlying pesticide ban

The NFU has called for farmers and growers to write to their MEPs to protest about the proposed European pesticide rules, after a compromise failed to meet British demands.

The proposed rules have been marked by disagreement between the European Parliament, which wants much stricter rules, and the Council of Ministers, which takes a softer line.

On Wednesday night, after extensive discussion between the Council, the Parliament and the Commission, a compromise to the proposals was hammered out. However the compromise falls far short of British demands.

The environment committee of the Parliament had said that it would largely accept the position of the Council, however it suggested a series of amendments, which would have outlawed many common agents.

On Wednesday, the council accepted almost all the Council's amendments, although it did make some concessions, on proposals which could effectively have outlawed pyrethroids. Under the initial amendments, a pesticide with any immunotoxic or neurotoxic properties would effectively be banned. The accepted amendment has moderated this position.

The NFU has reacted angrily to the agreement. NFU Plant Health Adviser Paul Chambers hit back at the EU, accusing it of using ‘poor science' and making rules that could leave farmers without any weapons for combating some kinds of pests.

The NFU is trying to arrange meetings with MEPs to express their strong feelings. However, because of the Christmas holidays, it may be difficult to do this before the formal plenary vote of the MEPs takes place in early January.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

What does the 25-year plan mean for growers?

What does the 25-year plan mean for growers?

Published on 11 January, the Government's long-awaited 'A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment' brings together a number of policy strands into a single framework that will impact many sectors, not least fresh produce, over the coming decades.

What will 'embracing change' mean for horticulture?

What will 'embracing change' mean for horticulture?

At the Oxford Farming Conference, whose theme was "embracing change", Defra secretary Michael Gove expanded on what a post-Brexit UK agriculture and land-use policy will look like and how it will impact farmers and growers.

Can growers see off the looming labour crisis by boosting efficiency?

Can growers see off the looming labour crisis by boosting efficiency?

Concern over the availability of seasonal labour to the fresh-produce industry has never been greater.