Health campaign in jeopardy as fresh produce faces tighter rules

Efforts to increase consumption of fruit and vegetables to improve the nation's health are being undermined by the proposed legislation, which could affect the economic viability of producing certain fruit and vegetable crops within the EU, writes Stockbridge Technology Centre's Martin McPherson.

The European Parliament's environment committee argues that one of the primary intentions of the new rules is to "protect consumer health". Yet, the Pesticides Safety Directorate's (PSD's) revised impact assessment states: "No meaningful benefits to public health protection from any of the criteria have been demonstrated."

The current proposal being "railroaded" through the EU process aims to use a hazard-based system instead of a scientifically based risk assessment of pesticides.

One of the proposed "hazard triggers", endocrine disruption, still has no proper definition, let alone an agreed standardised test for it.

This potentially affects a large number of pesticides, especially the triazole fungicides, a very important group of products on many agricultural and horticultural crops. Residue levels in produce at harvest are either zero or trace levels only, and scientific risk assessment has previously demonstrated that there is a negligible risk to consumers.

It is possible that these products will be banned through the proposed shift to a hazard-based approval system. Consider this though - similar triazole fungicides are also used in human and veterinary medicines. So, on the one hand, environmental "green" lobby groups are suggesting that minute traces of residues of triazole fungicides in our food might do us harm, yet many people willingly swallow triazole fungicides in high doses on advice from their GP.

There are a few other important points. Farmers and growers unable to grow crops economically in the EU due to these proposals will find production being exported outside the EU and subject to "import tolerances", which remain risk-based.

The current hazard trigger approach will effectively stop the registration process in its tracks for certain groups of compounds - the proposed new "neurotoxicity trigger" alone will potentially ban some 20 or so important insecticides.

Rather than applying an automatic cut-off, why not follow the lead adopted by REACH and use the triggers to determine the need for additional data to complete a risk assessment?

Referral of such "at risk" compounds to the European Food Standards Authority would allow for a scientific risk assessment in relation to the intended use.

Pesticides are merely phyto-medicines used to prevent infections but, unlike in human and veterinary medicine, immunisation programmes are not generally available in the agricultural and horticultural sector so control options are much more limited.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

What is being done to develop biocontrols against orchard pests?

What is being done to develop biocontrols against orchard pests?

The SIVAL horticultural trade show in Angers, France, this week (16-18 January) heard about several initiatives to promote more environmentally sustainable orchard growing.

What does the 25-year plan mean for growers?

What does the 25-year plan mean for growers?

Published on 11 January, the Government's long-awaited 'A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment' brings together a number of policy strands into a single framework that will impact many sectors, not least fresh produce, over the coming decades.

What will 'embracing change' mean for horticulture?

What will 'embracing change' mean for horticulture?

At the Oxford Farming Conference, whose theme was "embracing change", Defra secretary Michael Gove expanded on what a post-Brexit UK agriculture and land-use policy will look like and how it will impact farmers and growers.


Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +
Horticulture Jobs
More Horticulture Jobs

Pest & Disease Tracker bulletin 

The latest pest and disease alerts, how to treat them, plus EAMU updates, sent direct to your inbox.

Sign up here

Professor Geoffrey Dixon

GreenGene International chair Geoff Dixon on the business of fresh produce production
 

Read Professor Geoffrey Dixon