Useful points aired in latest peat debate

From the billing of last Friday's programme For Peat's Sake it was always clear that this BBC exploration of the use of peat and its alternatives in gardening was unlikely to travel far beyond the corporation's "environmentally correct" comfort zone.

For all that, some debate is better than none. And there were some very good elements to the programme - not least Toby Buckland's interviews with Ball Colegrave's Peter Byrne and Pioneer Plants' John Hoyland, which illustrated the very real technical challenges faced by the industry in attempting to meet the Government's arbitrary target of 90 per cent peat reduction by 2010. The discussion of the trials being undertaken by Ball and the wider industry with alternative growing media will also have sent a clear message to retail customers concerned about the issue that the industry that serves them is working hard to find viable solutions.

And, as Buckland did point out, none of this is being done with so much as a penny from Government.

Other good elements included Gardening Which? trials of alternative media. The message showed that the performance of all kinds of media is variable - and that what consumers need are hard facts for their purchasing decisions, not moral exhortations.

Other parts of the special were less convincing. After much emphasis on the seriousness of the issue, the programme asked Tim Briercliffe, as chairman of the Growing Media Initiative, which aims to get all parties working on the reduction target, whether this is just an attempt to make the industry look good. Why is it that if someone is employed in the industry it's OK to be cynical about their motives, but if they are employed by an environmental organisation whatever they say must be gospel truth? And what else is industry supposed to do? Pack up and go home?

Another disappointing element was the portrayal of Peter Sea-brook as the big bad peat man. What a fantastic opportunity the programme makers had here to have a thorough debate with someone always prepared to say exactly what he thinks - no matter what sensitivities he may ruffle. And they blew it by, at times, barely allowing him to finish his sentence. What a shame.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

Buoyant demand for UK apples but frost and labour remain concerns

Buoyant demand for UK apples but frost and labour remain concerns

As the British apple season begins, English Apples & Pears (EAP) is warning that growers will feel the effects of both a late frost in spring and also constrained labour supply.

Tomorrow's tractors

Tomorrow's tractors

These machines have advanced rapidly over recent years but what does the future hold? Sally Drury looks ahead.

Tractors for growers

Tractors for growers

The latest specialist tractors are providing wider choice for growers working in narrow rows, Sally Drury reports.


Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +
Horticulture Jobs
More Horticulture Jobs

Pest & Disease Tracker bulletin 

The latest pest and disease alerts, how to treat them, plus EAMU updates, sent direct to your inbox.

Sign up here

Professor Geoffrey Dixon

GreenGene International chair Geoff Dixon on the business of fresh produce production
 

Read Professor Geoffrey Dixon