How would pesticide ban affect production?

Research argues restrictions on use of neonicotinoids pose risk to field crops.

Pollinators: further studies on effect of neonicotinoids - image: John Earl
Pollinators: further studies on effect of neonicotinoids - image: John Earl

Production of many field crops including vegetables is at risk if neonicotinoid pesticides are more widely restricted or banned completely, Rothamsted Research argues in a position statement published this week.

"Furthermore, if groups of chemistries are limited by legislation, the remaining groups will be more widely used, resulting in an increased risk of pests developing resistance to them," it adds.

The institute's concern follows draft proposals by the EU to replace its temporary restriction on the use of three neonicotinoids on flowering crops with a widespread ban across Europe, potentially covering all field crops, not just flowering ones.

Rothamsted says it "laments the lack of evidence for the pesticide restrictions" and reiterates its 2014 call for "a proper science-led risk assessment to ... help us balance the risks and benefits for crop protection, crop pollination, ecosystem function and our health appropriately".

The NFU is urging farmers and growers to make political representatives aware of the "devastating" results of a blanket neonicotinoid ban on outdoor crops. The union has written to the European Commission outlining the consequences that it says such a ban would have on farmers.

NFU vice-president Guy Smith says: "A blanket ban of neonicotinoids would not only impact major crops such as cereals but also sugar beet and vegetables, as there are no effective alternatives to neonicotinoid seed treatments which form an incredibly important part of integrated pest management. By denying UK farmers these key crop production tools, our competitors who have access to these products are being gifted a market."

The calls have coincided with the publication of further research that is critical of the pesticides. A recent study by Royal Holloway University of London on the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam found that it reduces ovary development in queens of four bumblebee species when present at "field-realistic levels".

Lead author Dr Gemma Baron says: "Previous studies have focused on a single bumblebee species and examined impacts in workers and established colonies. But bumblebee populations rely on spring queens to succeed and by looking at the impacts of thiamethoxam on multiple species of spring queens we have gained a step change in our understanding."

Co-author Professor Nigel Raine adds of the EU's proposals: "This work adds significantly to the evidence base on which to make such important policy decisions."

Unsolved puzzle

NFU horticultural policy adviser Dr Chris Hartfield says of the research, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: "This is another interesting piece to an unsolved puzzle about how neonicotinoids affect bees. But it does not show that under real-life field conditions, where bees forage naturally on treated crops, neonicotinoids are causing widespread declines in pollinator populations. Farmers are well aware of the importance of bees and would not want to cause population declines."

On the EU proposals, he adds: "There are still knowledge gaps and a limited evidence base to guide and inform policymakers on this issue."

Meanwhile, a report published this month by the US Center for Food Safety has found "continued widespread water contamination from neonicotinoid insecticides ... at levels known to be toxic to several aquatic invertebrates", which it says can lead to "rippling negative effects throughout the food web".

A University of Iowa study earlier this year found neonicotinoids in local drinking water. It concluded that the chemicals "are likely present in other drinking water systems across the US". The main use of neonicotinoids, as seed coatings, remains unregulated by the US Environmental Protection Agency.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

Can UK fresh produce come out of Brexit ahead?

Can UK fresh produce come out of Brexit ahead?

UK production horticulture can become more profitable under one possible Brexit scenario, while other more drastic scenarios will lead to only minor losses in profitability, a new report argues.

Business Planning - Staff are your greatest asset

Business Planning - Staff are your greatest asset

An effective strategy to retain staff is the best way for any business to avoid a potential recruitment crisis, Neville Stein advises.

How should agri-tech research for fresh produce function in a post-Brexit UK?

How should agri-tech research for fresh produce function in a post-Brexit UK?

One area affected by the uncertainty around Brexit will be the ongoing development of agricultural technology, seen by many as essential to retain Britain's productivity and competitiveness in fresh produce along with other farming sectors.


Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +
Horticulture Jobs
More Horticulture Jobs

Pest & Disease Tracker bulletin 

The latest pest and disease alerts, how to treat them, plus EAMU updates, sent direct to your inbox.

Sign up here

Professor Geoffrey Dixon

GreenGene International chair Geoff Dixon on the business of fresh produce production
 

Read Professor Geoffrey Dixon