NFU hits back at strongly-worded attack by the Guardian on CAP

The Guardian newspaper has stoked anger among grower leaders after a strongly worded editorial comment condemned the Common Agricultural Policy as rotten.

NFU defended the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after the 5 July editorial headlined ‘Rotten but here to stay’, which suggested it be replaced by smaller, targeted schemes serving green and social goals.

"Everybody agrees the €50bn a year common agricultural policy is rotten. Everybody, in public, promises reform. Everybody, in private, is out for what they can get. The result is an economic and environmental disaster."

The editorial went to say poor farmers struggled while rich corporations creamed off profits; there were 174 "French subsidy millionaires" and other recipients included a Swedish accordion club and Danish billiard club.

Tom Hind, NFU head of economics and international affairs, responded: "A proper analysis of CAP spending in 2009 would reveal that over €39 billion was spent on supporting the incomes of over seven million farmers across the EU, whose average income is less than a half the EU average wage.

"Far from harming the environment, the CAP supports sustainable production. Direct aids to farmers are linked to meeting EU legislation in respect of the environment.

"What is more, €13 billion worth of CAP support is spent annually on rural development and agri-environmental measures.

"A consequence of this is that over 6.5 million hectares of land in England (nearly 70%) is now subject to a CAP-funded environmental scheme."

"It’s about time we saw a more balanced appraisal of the benefits of a European policy that costs less than half a percent of EU economic output, yet ensures that European consumers are supplied with food that is produced in the EU to standards of animal welfare and the environment that are arguably higher than anywhere else in the world.

"Further reform of the CAP is desirable to develop a more market focused, competitive sector that, ultimately can become less reliant on public support. Simply scrapping the CAP as you advocate would lead to the ruination of the EU farming sector and in turn, ruination of EU landscapes, the environment and, fundamentally food production in Europe."

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

How will reduced apple and pear harvests hit the industry?

How will reduced apple and pear harvests hit the industry?

This spring, many top-fruit growers in the UK and across Europe were dismayed to discover that swathes of their orchards had been hit by frost.

How should fruit growers prepare for water abstraction reform?

How should fruit growers prepare for water abstraction reform?

Upcoming reforms to water abstraction licensing will for the first time cap the amount of water that fruit growers can take for trickle irrigation.

Getting a measure of the production labour crisis

Getting a measure of the production labour crisis

At a debate during last week's Fruit Focus trade show in Kent, senior industry figures painted a bleak picture of an increasingly difficult seasonal labour market that is already impacting on investment.