Netherlands report finds no solid ground for ending use of peat completely

A recent study carried out by the Netherlands government into the horticultural use of peat has found no sound argument for phasing out its use completely.

Speaking at the Defra peat consultation meeting, Professor Jack Rieley of the International Peat Society presented the findings and said there were opportunities for conservation bodies and the peat industry to work together.

He objected to proposals for a complete phase-out and said: "There are environmental and moral reasons for minimising the use of peat within a strategy that allows the horticulture industry to continue to use peat while further refining and increasing the use of non-peat substitutes."

The Enhancing the Sustainability of the Peat Supply Chain for Dutch Horticulture report identified the input of the sector to the economy, stating that there were no long-term alternatives to peat available.

It concluded that there were no sound arguments for the phase-out of peat in the Dutch horticulture sector and identified a five-point strategy for the future:

- Exclude the use of peat from high biodiversity areas.

- Allow peat extraction from degraded land using best practice measures.

- Create transparency in greenhouse gas emissions relating to peat-based products.

- Ensure future extraction of peat is from degraded peatland only.

- Develop long-term alternatives.

The report pointed out that the conservation of peat areas was the responsibility of governments and recommended that the Dutch horticulture industry explored options for: creating transparency in the peat supply chain; agreeing criteria for biodiversity and including them in quality assurance schemes; creating a business case for a more climate-friendly peat supply chain; and looking at options for the use of steamed degraded peat.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

Can UK fresh produce come out of Brexit ahead?

Can UK fresh produce come out of Brexit ahead?

UK production horticulture can become more profitable under one possible Brexit scenario, while other more drastic scenarios will lead to only minor losses in profitability, in contrast to other farming sectors, according to a new report by levy body AHDB with Agra CEAS Consulting.

Business Planning - Staff are your greatest asset

Business Planning - Staff are your greatest asset

An effective strategy to retain staff is the best way for any business to avoid a potential recruitment crisis, Neville Stein advises.

How should agri-tech research for fresh produce function in a post-Brexit UK?

How should agri-tech research for fresh produce function in a post-Brexit UK?

One area affected by the uncertainty around Brexit will be the ongoing development of agricultural technology, seen by many as essential to retain Britain's productivity and competitiveness in fresh produce along with other farming sectors.

Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +
Horticulture Jobs
More Horticulture Jobs

Pest & Disease Tracker bulletin 

The latest pest and disease alerts, how to treat them, plus EAMU updates, sent direct to your inbox.

Sign up here

Professor Geoffrey Dixon

GreenGene International chair Geoff Dixon on the business of fresh produce production

Read Professor Geoffrey Dixon