Local parks forum launches petition against Bristol green space self-funding plan

The Bristol Parks Forum has launched a petition urging Bristol City Council to reconsider plans to withdraw funding for parks completely by the 2019/20 financial year.

Netham Park, Bristol. Image: Andrew Bennett/Flickr
Netham Park, Bristol. Image: Andrew Bennett/Flickr

The council has earmarked parks as a service which it wants to become self-funding in its 2017-22 Corporate Strategy and said it wants to "develop new models of community asset management and leadership of key neighbourhood assets, including libraries, customer service points, community buildings, parks and green spaces." 

The plan states that in this financial year it would work "with stakeholders to develop a robust plan to consider ways of raising income and reducing cost to create a self-funding service".

Cuts outlined in its current budget, passed on February 21, include losing the entire 2016/17 parks budget of £3.9 million by cutting £425,000 in 2017/18, £632,000 in 2018/19 and £2.86m in 2019/20. The department brought in income of less than £1m in the financial year just completed.  

In the petition, the forum states: "Bristol Parks Forum believes this is impossible to achieve in such a short timescale. Many other big cities are exploring this option, some have already decided it simply won't work; this was also the conclusion of last year's Select Committee of the House of Commons.

"We, the undersigned, call on Bristol City Council to withdraw this budget plan and work with the Parks Forum and others to develop a realistic alternative."

Forum members, made up of dozens of park friends groups and other community groups, say they are concerned about the "high risk that there will be a drastic cut in the maintenance of parks that will lead to a downward spiral of reduced use and increased anti-social behaviour as standards fall."

They say they just do not believe it can be possible to more than quadruple income in such a short space of time, and would "require significant investment of both of capital and commercial expertise over several years. 

"Bristol Parks Forum believes that while a significant increase in income can be achieved; having well maintained parks operating on a cost neutral basis by 2019 is simply not possible."

 


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

Sargent's solutions - how to attract the best staff for your business

Sargent's solutions - how to attract the best staff for your business

There are ways to find quality candidates for horticultural jobs if you widen your search parameters, Alan Sargent suggests.

Get set for Saltex 2017

Get set for Saltex 2017

This year's Saltex show at the NEC in Birmingham offers something for everyone, says Sally Drury.

Sargent's Solutions: What is the difference between a head gardener and gardens manager? Part 2

Sargent's Solutions: What is the difference between a head gardener and gardens manager? Part 2

In the second of a two-part article, Alan Sargent looks at the functions of today's gardens manager.


Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +
Horticulture Jobs
More Horticulture Jobs
Horticulture Week Custodian Awards 2017 - the winners!

Find out more about the outstanding parks, gardens and arboricultural projects and teams that became our Custodian Award 2017 winners.

Products & Kit Resources