Environmental reviews will help parks meet sustainable targets

Parks managers need to develop more systematic environmental reviews to ensure that green spaces are seen as an essential element of meeting sustainability targets.

According to consultant Paul Hyde, many local authorities are carrying out environmental work on an ad hoc basis or covering a confined range of issues.

"There is an emphasis on issues such as avoiding peat or minimising pesticides," explained Hyde, during GreenSpace's conference on sustainability last week.

"These issues are important but you can be doing so much more. That means making environmental practices more systematic and comprehensive and articulating what you are doing."

The best way to improve sustainability in parks is to conduct an environmental review, Hyde told more than 80 delegates at the Sustainable Parks: Sustainable Futures conference in Liverpool on 2 March. "It helps define where you are now," he explained. "Then it is possible to build environmental issues into parks management plans."

The "essential part" of a review is to examine all the inputs and outputs of a green space, added Hyde.These include the materials used, chemicals, water, energy, flora and fauna and even the carrying capacity of the park, or number of visitors.

"It might mean looking at procurement, for example are the benches made from FSC wood?"

He added: "Are waste bins segregated for recycling? And can sustainability be built into landscape design and new buildings or refurbishments? Don't forget the social value of parks in terms of sustainability."

CABE Space adviser Nicola Mathers agreed that involving local people could be beneficial.

She said: "We know if local people get involved it helps spaces become more sustainable. We can't think about environmental sustainability in isolation from social and financial sustainability and local groups can bring in income and access money that local authorities cannot."

Mathers highlighted cases where community involvement had been successful, including the River Quaggy flood alleviation project in south London and Augustenborg in Malmo, Sweden.


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

Sargent's Solutions: What is the difference between a head gardener and gardens manager? Part 2

Sargent's Solutions: What is the difference between a head gardener and gardens manager? Part 2

In the second of a two-part article, Alan Sargent looks at the functions of today's gardens manager.

Tractors - Maintenance models

Tractors - Maintenance models

The tractors chosen by professionals across the sector reflect the best features, backup and support on offer, says Sally Drury.

Horticulture education update - staying on course

Horticulture education update - staying on course

Raised levels of investment in horticulture education and increased student take-up is welcome news for the industry, says Rachel Anderson.


Follow us on:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google +
Horticulture Jobs
More Horticulture Jobs
Horticulture Week Custodian Awards 2017 - the winners!

Find out more about the outstanding parks, gardens and arboricultural projects and teams that became our Custodian Award 2017 winners.

Contracts & Tenders

Products & Kit Resources