Assured Produce scheme cuts number of failure points

The Assured Produce (AP) scheme has reduced its number of critical failure points (CFPs) from more than 50 to just five.

The move is likely to come as a relief to many growers who felt under pressure at the prospect of being suspended from the scheme if they did not comply with one of the 50 points.

The new rules, which will come into force on 1 October, have been brought in to ensure that AP is in line with the UKAS EN45011 accreditation requirements.

These requirements are, in some ways, tougher than the old rules as they state that all non-conformances - to CFPs or other standards - have to be signed off before certification can be granted.

Previously, AP members were given some grace because some non-conformances were left open.

However, the reduction from 50 to just five CFPs is still likely to ease the pressure on growers.

The five remaining CFPs ensure food safety and relate to the following areas:

- illegal pesticide use;

- the breaking of harvest intervals or utilisation intervals;

- the use of sewage water for irrigation.

Last year, the British Independent Fruit Growers' Association (BIFGA) held a series of meetings in which they criticised the "silliness" of some of the old CFPs - which included not having a sprayer MOT or not using the AP logo correctly. The group also questioned the rights that AP auditors had to suspend growers for such "minor" reasons.

BIFGA chairman John Breach, who last year formed a focus group to challenge AP on the high number of CFPs, remains sceptical about the changes.

He told Grower: "There are still five too many (CFPs). I think growers will still be concerned that they can be closed down without warning.

"The changes are something that we will discuss at our next farm assurance meeting after harvest."


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

How will reduced apple and pear harvests hit the industry?

How will reduced apple and pear harvests hit the industry?

This spring, many top-fruit growers in the UK and across Europe were dismayed to discover that swathes of their orchards had been hit by frost.

How should fruit growers prepare for water abstraction reform?

How should fruit growers prepare for water abstraction reform?

Upcoming reforms to water abstraction licensing will for the first time cap the amount of water that fruit growers can take for trickle irrigation.

Getting a measure of the production labour crisis

Getting a measure of the production labour crisis

At a debate during last week's Fruit Focus trade show in Kent, senior industry figures painted a bleak picture of an increasingly difficult seasonal labour market that is already impacting on investment.