Agrochemical regulation post-Brexit can benefit food production, trade and the environment, says BCPC

Real benefits could come from Brexit for UK food production by maximising science-based, proportionate decision-making, whilst achieving harmonisation with global authorities to facilitate trade within and outside the EU, Dr Colin Ruscoe, president of the British Crop Production Council (BCPC), has told the Oxford Farming Conference.

He said: "Last month, Andrea Leadsom, Secretary of State for Defra, said, 'food security and trading are incredibly important; we want to be growing, selling and exporting more food'. And even before the Brexit vote, the agri-food sector was advocating reversal in the decline in the UK’s self-sufficiency, increasing farming’s productivity, exports, competitiveness and profitability. This included a call for science to be applied to the regulation of crop protection products. 

"The objective of the post-Brexit crop protection product regulation must be to provide safe, effective products, whilst enabling export of agricultural products to EU and elsewhere. It should maintain or improve human safety and environmental standards, and facilitate both Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and resistance management. We can get real benefits from ‘Brexit’ for UK food production by maximising science-based, proportionate decision-making, whilst achieving harmonisation with global authorities to facilitate trade within and outside the EU."

Dr Ruscoe argued that the UK should adopt a fully risk-based approach to product registration, involving US EPA-style practices, and simplified procedures for minor uses, bio-pesticides and other ‘low risk’ products.

"We should remove the EU’s unscientific ‘hazard-based’ assessments and the associated ‘Candidates for Substitution’ and ‘Comparative Assessment’ processes and, particularly, political interference in the regulatory process. Instead, the importance of the UK Chemicals Regulation Division’s (CRD) current approach – open communication, stakeholder consultation and training, should be emphasised.

"Risk assessment-based registration can support a sustainable range of safe crop protection products, essential if farmers are to both grow more food and improve environmental protection without taking more land for cultivation. And it can underpin future UK regulation without prejudice to EU and global trade. It therefore deserves full support from Defra, CRD – and from environmental organisations." 


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Read These Next

Pest & Disease Factsheet - Bacterial and fungal canker

Pest & Disease Factsheet - Bacterial and fungal canker

A wide range of nursery stock can be susceptible to potential damage from various cankers.

Pest & Disease Factsheet - Spider mites

Pest & Disease Factsheet - Spider mites

Defences for protected and outdoor ornamentals.

Pest and disease management - Powdery mildew in edible field crops

Pest and disease management - Powdery mildew in edible field crops

Powdery mildew in field crops, by Professor Geoffrey Dixon